london

The Wrong (and Right) Albion

A short story about context and mistakes.

The first thought that ran through my head: A and T have much better taste than this.

Shortly thereafter, another thought: I should have confirmed exactly where we were meeting.

And the first thing I did: call A.

What did I do wrong?

***

When A suggested a place for brunch on Saturday, I quickly “used the Google” to figure out where it was. Of the many results for “Albion”, the leading result was a restaurant that appeared to be relatively near where he lived, had many reviews, and boasted of awards they had received for best Sunday brunch. Based on those facts, I made a quick decision that the Albion would be a good place and agreed to it with A.

But when I arrived there near the mutually-agreed time and day, I was a little surprised. The Albion was a pub in a very residential area, not what I was expecting. It was also empty, and the staff seemed a bit surprised when I mentioned I was meeting someone for brunch.

“Oh, we don’t have a chef for brunch today.”

Hmm. Instantly, I thought: the wrong Albion. Mutually-agreed time and day, but independently-agreed place.

The Wrong Albion, London, England
The Wrong Albion, London, England

A quick phone call to get the address of the right Albion, a quick consultation with my map, the ah-hah flashed across my mind, and 10 minutes and £7 later I was at the right Albion, a mistake corrected.

The Right Albion, London, England
The Right Albion, London, England

One would say I was lucky that the right Albion was so close; but knowing that they would select a place relatively near their place, if they had suggested a place located far away I would have been surprised by the results of my initial search and followed up to confirm the location.

Instead, I took a couple data points*, make a quick decision, and filed it away. Updated the schedule in my mind. Too fast, as it appeared.

We make decisions with limited information and context all day, every single day. If you’re action oriented, mistakes happen. But failing to act is a far bigger problem than making a mistake.

And if the problem can be solved in less than 10 minutes for less than £10, then it isn’t really a problem.

* Yes, I neglected one small data point which should have raised a question in my mind earlier. So it goes.

“Social media tools are just that: tools”

Standing out, but under-hyped…

I Believe, London, England
I Believe, London, England, Dec 2009

Ethan Bauley, Backstory on the Umair Haque hang, plus: why social media is underhyped:

… there are many things that these new media technologies can do to make people better off, but they require specific application to specific problems…not just the meta-problem of media itself. That’s why I think social media is “under hyped”, because few have really executed strategies that take advantage of the broader implications and opportunities of hyperconnectivity (also note The Shift Index).

What I mean by that is: things like StockTwits and Hello Health and Lend4Health and eduFire and awe.sm and Topspin are about 80 billion times more valuable and interesting than, say, AdMob (here’s a nice post from Umair explaining why).

A lot of people are spending their time figuring out how new ways to connect buyers and vendors so they can engage in the same old transaction. But what we really need are new kinds of transactions and new roles for economic actors (check out Doc Searls VRM project for an example and Eric von Hippel generally).

Social media tools are just that: tools. Here’s hoping more people start using them to build a better plane/train/couch/IRA/classroom, instead of wringing their hands over advertising.

Definitely dig into the comments for a great conversation on a variety of spin-off topics…

 

MORE: Financial Models for Entrepreneurs