Perspective

I want to…

When you think “I want to..”, what do you do?

I want, New Orleans, May 2012
I want… powered by Neighborland.

When you think “I want to..”, what do you do?

When you want to share a thought, store a link, find an idea, research a person, find new music, ask a question, share a photo, etc., what do you do? And do you even think about it?

Each one of these actions can be accomplished in many ways with a variety of products on the web; each one of these actions has a multitude of companies competing to be our preferred, default method for getting what we want done. Some are even trying to convince us of new things we need to do. They are attempting to create internal triggers (impulses to use their product) and habits (use our product every day / week / time) in the hope of creating the kind of mass adoption and usage to create widely-known unique signifiers around their products.

I.e. when something in your life happens, they want you to immediately think “I should do this using xxx”, tapping into a unique, discrete trigger embedded into your behavior.

Not easy, obviously. But tremendously valuable if you can swing it.

The implications for startups? Is it possible to create that trigger? How much does that action occur every day, every week, every month? How hard is it to establish that habit in people? How hard is it to tear that impulse away from a competing service? How hard is it create a new social action? How can you build a networked community based on a mass of people taking a single action? And if you’re wondering, advertising and branding isn’t enough, this takes products and communities.

Context First

The next set of winners in web services will use the organizing principle of “context first” to build on top of social platforms, mobile platforms and data platforms to rethink how their business operates.

When I hear people say “mobile will be huge” I cringe: mobile is already huge, and has been huge around the world for many years. To say “mobile” will be big is a useless generalization, because “mobile” means so many different things. But moreso, mobile isn’t a product feature: it’s an organizing principle.

What’s the difference? Take “social”. Paul Adams, Stop talking about social:

“… the rise of the social web is a structural change being driven by online life catching up with offline life. The winners in this world will be the ones who assume social behaviour in everything they do. It won’t be the ones thinking about social as a feature or product in isolation. The winners will be existing businesses who build on top of social platforms to rethink how their business operates.”

In a similar vein, the winners in mobile will be those who are able to build on top of mobile platforms to rethink how their business operates. And that’s happening as we speak. The smartest companies on the web are unlearning what they did for the “big web” and relearning how to recreate their businesses around the “small web”. They’re learning how to use smarter devices, smarter networks, smarter sensors, smarter systems of contextual data to build smarter companies. They’re learning how to use context.

Chris Dixon:

… the really massive opportunity is dreaming up new ways that the little computers loaded with sensors that we carry around with us everywhere can improve our real-world experiences.

The key to this (and to the sentiment echoed by Saar) is to focus less on the device and more on the individuals using the device.

And how does that work? It all starts by using personal, contextual data to create unique experiences for individual people. As Saar points out,

“Smart” means understanding a user and understanding their physical and mental state. Smart services will process user information in the background to make accurate predictions around real-time user intention and will offer suggestions, results and different user interfaces/interactions based on their prediction of state.

A couple weeks ago at the launch of WIM I asked Veronika a question about how she saw the “big web” and “small web” evolving and if she saw the distinction between the two breaking down. Her answer, about how she didn’t see the distinction between them in that vein because she saw “the web” as different experiences best facilitated by each device, led me to respond that it “wasn’t about mobile first, but context first”.

And it all starts with data: personal, user-centric, contextual intent data. Of course, that isn’t easy or cheap; we haven’t seen many truly great applications leveraging contextual data yet because context is incredibly expensive to get right: hard to learn, hard to create, hard to action. But that’s the opportunity.

Organizing principles work as calls to action, as frames of reference, of sources of inspiration. The organizing principle of “mobile first, web second” has inspired a wave of mobile applications; but “context first” is the type of organizing principle that will lead to truly disruptive web services.

People first. User first. Context first.

~

And yes, investing in the disrupting force of data in advertising and marketing technology is core to our investment thesis at kbs+ Ventures.

 

MORE: Financial Models for Entrepreneurs