March, 2011

Would you think differently about Color if it was a new Facebook feature?

Would you think differently about new startup Color if it had been announced as a new Facebook feature?

Color.com

Originally posted to the newsletter Wednesday, March 24, 11:30 PM. Sign up here.

Here’s the thing about Color.

(Background, Techcrunch: Color Looks To Reinvent Social Interaction With Its Mobile Photo App (And $41 Million In Funding)

Yes, $41 million is wild. The Twitter buzz is that it’s too much money to fund another photo-sharing app. It’s been described as a photo Twitter, a photo chatroulette (which faded fast after the initial buzz), the opposite of Path, etc. And I’m steadfastly on the record that the world doesn’t need another photo-sharing app.

But here’s the thing: it’s not just a photo-sharing app. Sequoia, Bain and SVB aren’t funding this for $41 million with the idea that it’s just a photo-sharing app. Flush with cash in a hot market, yes. Dumb, no.

Photo-sharing is just the trojan horse to get it on your phone. It’s an app meant to collect data about highly local, highly personal experiences, that is built to learn about you, where you go, track what you’re doing, who you’re with, and recommend things and people to you based on all that information. And by “recommend”, I mean advertise to: highly targeted, highly relevant, highly contextual advertising. What’s the CPM / CPA on a highly targeted recommendation sent to you on your phone when you’re making a purchase decision?

Or think of this differently: what would you think about Color if it was announced as a new Facebook feature, rather than a new startup?

Quite differently, yes, you would. And that’s what it is, except that Facebook hasn’t bought it yet.

Updated

  • Manu Kumar: “Seeing all the tweets about Color launch. I will be disappointed if the Color app isn’t just a trojan horse for a new mobile social network.” (tweet)
  • Fred Wilson, The Implicit Social Graph
Hardware is the new software. Entrepreneurs and investors, get on board.

Hardware is the new software. Entrepreneurs and investors, get on board.

Build a Rocket, Maker Faire, San Francisco, CA

A peek inside the newsletter, this post was originally sent on March 11.

Interesting to see three unrelated articles about manufacturing in Wired’s recent issues: "Made in America: Small Businesses Buck the Offshoring Trend" and "In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits".

The basic premise of the first is that the decreasing cost benefits of outsourcing to China, combined with the problems of the long supply-chain and the difficulties in innovating and quickly launching new products to market, is decreasing the benefits of offshoring and bringing some small manufacturers back to the US.  For many small manufacturers the quality, control over IP, and flexibility can lead to higher per-unit profits even if the per-unit manufacturing cost is 50% higher.

The second is about how the technology to invent, draft and build physical products is improving to make it increasingly possible for entrepreneurs to test and create physical products flexibly, quickly, and cost-effectively. One of the key technologies highlighted is 3D printing, which isn’t new, but is finally becoming inexpensive and practical enough for the masses to pay attention to it.

Chris Anderson glamorizes the trend a bit:

If the past 10 years have been about discovering post-institutional social models on the Web, then the next 10 years will be about applying them to the real world.

… Transformative change happens when industries democratize, when they’re ripped from the sole domain of companies, governments, and other institutions and handed over to regular folks. The Internet democratized publishing, broadcasting, and communications, and the consequence was a massive increase in the range of both participation and participants in everything digital — the long tail of bits.

Now the same is happening to manufacturing — the long tail of things.

The opportunities for the hardware entrepreneur have never been better.

Granted, obstacles exist: hardware businesses have a range of functions and responsibilities that software businesses simply don’t have. Fulfillment, stocking, customer service, etc., all of these are competencies that most software companies have never had to address in the same way.  Designing and manufacturing are getting easier, but the rest of the functions still require a lot of work for entrepreneurs to manage growth.

Managing scaling will be one of the most difficult problems for the hardware entrepreneur.  But on the flip side, it’s also an opportunity for entrepreneurs to build the outsourced platforms and systems for hardware entrepreneurs to use.  Blogging didn’t take off until WordPress, Blogger, TypePad and the like created the platforms for bloggers to start a blog simply, quickly, for free.  Companies like Appmakr will soon make it incredibly simple for anyone to make mobile apps.

Hardware entrepreneurship will be the same.  The first companies to build the combination of free product development software and easy "upload and build" outsourced hardware manufacturing line will make it easy for anyone to make physical products.  Hardware entrepreneurship has it’s own brand of difficulties, but they are risks that entrepreneurs and venture capitalists will learn to take.

The eventual winners? The platforms, the mass hit products, the successful niche products in the long tail, and the investors that bet on them. As always.

 

MORE: Financial Models for Entrepreneurs