Fighting a backlog of interesting things to comment on, dealing by quoting bits that resonated with me…

  • Michael Lewkowitz, Into 2010:

    Looking back at last year, it’s clear I can’t predict what will come of the year ahead, but I am pretty sure the direction it will follow.

    Thankfully it will be a journey of many. Without that, it wouldn’t be much fun.

    Hopefully it will make the world better. Without that, it wouldn’t be worth doing.

    Certainly it will be an adventure. Without that, it wouldn’t be much of anything.

    I know the feeling…

  • Grant McCracken, Recycling: adding value by adding meaning:

    What if objects straight from the factory seemed somehow orphaned, smaller and less interesting for the fact of their pristine condition.  If we care about recycling, we want objects to be better at absorbing and recording and reporting their histories. Of course, some objects will be incapable of telling stories: bottles and newspapers for instance. But clothing, furniture, technology, these could be storyful. And they could spared the landfill for one or more cycles of ownership by the stories they bring us.

    Resonates with the thinking about culturematics and the role of narratives in marketing, leading to…

  • Joshua Glenn, Which exposition strategy adds the most value?

    Our experiment has answered the question of whether narrative adds measurable value to near-worthless tchotchkes with an emphatic YES. But how does narrative do so? Is every form of narrative exposition, for example, equally effective in encouraging the reader to regard a thrift-store castoff as somehow meaningful?

    Read the rest of the post for a better understanding, but of the three types of narrative – description, sequence, classification – sequence proved to the most effective form of narrative in their experiment.

  • Stowe Boyd, It’s Betweenness That Matters, Not Your Eigenvalue: The Dark Matter Of Influence:

    The subtle, dark-matter mystery of social networks is that influence is oblique, and not easily determined by the sorts of tools we have today.

    … It is not your follower count, or who you follow, per se. But, instead, do you have short paths into other social scenes, both incoming and outgoing? That is the deep structure of being truly connected: bridging over different social scenes, acting as a conduit, a vector, a filter and amplifier for ideas good and bad, the best insights, and deadly viruses.

    via David Cushman.

  • John Hagel, Reshaping Relationships through Passion:

    Relationships built on passion are extremely strong and often defy the incentives of traditional bond formation.

    … passion provides a pull-based foundation for community building that liberates, for those who may feel alienated or different in traditional community settings.

    In a constantly changing world of shift and flows, finding (or founding) a passion-based community may be one of the most significant factors to staying oriented, rooted, and poised to grow. 

    The dynamics of passionate relationships are powerful elements of success in an era of continuous instability. Passion trumps inhibition in the service of new connections; shared passion provides a foundation for diverse relationships; and these relationships provide both stability and inspire growth for its members.

    Read the entire post for one of the most personally meaningful things I’ve read this year so far.

    Seriously, right now.

Hello, I'm Taylor Davidson.
I'm an early-stage VC and a photographer. If you liked this post, please subscribe to this blog. For more like this, check out the archives, and follow me on Twitter @tdavidson.
  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    oh dood… thanks for this recap… got me to see that hagel one… and once again seeing how seem to have similar threads weaving through our lives. passion + stories + lifelogging… something to share with you and others maybe as #projectx moves forward. giddyup!

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    Everything there combines somehow, or at least it does in my mind. Passion, narratives, marketing, meaning = lessons and case studies for how business can and will evolve.

  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    absolutely does. People are perpetually seeking… and that seeking is found and expressed in passion. That's what motivates people to get up and do something real, something that brings value, that invites genius. As more and more of us move from dominated lives of producing widgets for others to being passionate producers of the world we want we find communities of people that share those passions and find ways to work together. The stories of what we want, believe, and envision lead to the stories of what we've done – of what others could do if they chose to too. Passionate + doing. Stories are a medium of the passion – allowing more to meet and morph it in their own way…

    Etc.

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    People are not perpetually seeking; and I'd argue that people have always explored their passions, but not always in business. Meaning: the passion, the stories, the communities, these things have always thrived on a mass scale, but they haven't always been expressed in creating (and selling) products and services.

    Stories are the expression of passion, the narratives created by following our passion; products and services are the medium. Right?

  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    Interesting. I actually think people are seeking meaning and what they've done is an expression of what's meaningful to them. Passion to me is more like flarings of meaning that compel us to step outside what we are doing right now.

    Meaning is what get's us up in the morning. Passion is what makes us jump out of bed.

    Stories are very effective ways to express meaning and passionate stories are the ones that are most compelling. Stories are rich in feeling, emotion, nuance, and literal ambiguity, allowing people to interpret, relate, and even engage/change/adopt. They are a medium for spreading it.

    I do think products/services are media as well… in fact every interaction ultimately is. The difference between meaning and passion comes out in the difference between dell and apple products.

    Where I think business, or maybe better institution/organization fail in this area, is their stifling of passion in favour of control – in having 'customer service' operators following scripts to deliver consistent message vs being enabled with information and tools to improve the customer's experience because the company is passionate about their experience, not manipulating lowest call-centre cost and maximum upsell. Meaning gets people show up for work. Passion infuses/infects them to make the company great.

  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    Maybe meaning is why do things and passion is what inspires others to do similar things in their own way?

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    Perhaps passion is what makes us start, meaning is what keeps us going?

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    Meaning = direction, passion = fuel.

  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    I like it. Feels right to me.

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/ Taylor Davidson

    cool. btw, keep an eye out for my next post :)

  • http://igniter.com/ Igniter

    Will do!

  • http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2010/02/14/meaning-direction-passion-fuel/ Meaning = Direction, Passion = Fuel | Taylor Davidson (@tdavidson)

    [...] a comment by Michael Lewkowitz on Closing tabs, opening minds: Meaning is what get’s us up in the morning. Passion is what makes us jump out of [...]

MORE: Financial Models for Entrepreneurs